Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesBNB
Leads45.00 s
- p99
- 119.20 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 8
Osmosis
Trails52.86 s
- p99
- 117.90 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 30
BNB vs Osmosis
BNB leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Osmosis on 0. BNB wins on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (45.00 s vs 52.86 s).
BNB
Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
BNB vs Osmosis: which one is better?
BNB and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest axelar gmp source chain by end-to-end delivery, BNB or Osmosis?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, BNB leads at 45.00 s versus Osmosis at 52.86 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BNB vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.