Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesBNB
Leads39.38 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 92provisional
Osmosis
Trails45.42 s
- p99
- 2.0 min
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 284
BNB vs Osmosis
BNB leads on the only live benchmark. BNB wins on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (39.38 s vs 45.42 s).
BNB
Proof-of-Staked-Authority L1 with 21 active validators rotating per epoch. Probabilistic finality reached after roughly 2 blocks. Block time around 3 seconds.
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
BNB vs Osmosis: which one is better?
BNB and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BNB leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, BNB or Osmosis?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, BNB leads at 39.38 s (provisional) versus Osmosis at 45.42 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BNB vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.