BONKbot vs FOMO

FOMO leads on both live benchmarks. FOMO wins on Trading app daily volume 2026 ($209.66M vs $1.01M), Trading terminal fill quality 2026 (336 bps vs 390 bps). Data as of 2026-09-27 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
FOMO logo
FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

Side by side measurements

Trading app daily volume 2026: GMGN, Axiom, FOMO, Terminal, Photon, Trojan by UTC day, every chain

Trading
ProviderDaily volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
BONKbot$1.01M$21.36M0.12%
FOMO$209.66M$7.75B42.5%
View
BONKbotn/aFOMOn/a

Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama adapter attributes to the app per UTC day, over every chain the adapter covers: FOMO is Solana only on DeFiLlama, GMGN spans ten chains. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows are dated one day behind, and GMGN's adapter skips some days. DeFiLlama can restate the last day for about a day; the series is re-read hourly.

Trading terminal fill quality 2026: what a swap costs on Axiom, GMGN, FOMO, Photon, Trojan, measured on-chain

Trading
ProviderCost per swapTerminal feeNetworkPoolFailed swaps
BONKbot390 bps98.7 bps47.3 bps60.7 bps1.28%
FOMO336 bps129 bps26.1 bps60.2 bps8.01%
View
BONKbotn/aFOMOn/a

Random sample (150 a day per row, Solana and EVM alike) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.

Frequently asked questions

BONKbot vs FOMO: which one is better?

BONKbot and FOMO are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Trading app daily volume 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher daily volume, BONKbot or FOMO?

On the Trading app daily volume 2026 benchmark, FOMO leads at $209.66M versus BONKbot at $1.01M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BONKbot vs FOMO comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.