Fastest crypto price API, live head lag across 6 data providers
AggregatorsHeadline: All chains
| Provider | Head lag | First to report |
|---|---|---|
| Codex | 0.20 s | 46.3% |
| Mobula | 0.25 s | 7.47% |
View
Codexn/aMobulan/a
Codex vs Mobula
Codex leads on the only live benchmark. Codex wins on Fastest crypto price API, live head lag across 6 data providers (0.20 s vs 0.25 s). Data as of 2026-11-01 UTC.
Codex
Onchain market data API for EVM and Solana. GraphQL and WebSocket feeds for tokens, pairs, trades, and pricing.
Mobula
Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs. Its swap endpoint routes multi-hop across named pools, so it is typed as an aggregator on the quote benches.
Side by side measurements
Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter
AggregatorsCodex
No data in window
Mobula
Leads69.1 %
- p99
- 72.0%
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 107,587
Field coverage
Codexn/aMobulan/a
Frequently asked questions
Codex vs Mobula: which one is better?
Codex and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Codex leads on Fastest crypto price API, live head lag across 6 data providers. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Codex or Mobula?
On the Fastest crypto price API, live head lag across 6 data providers benchmark, Codex leads at 0.20 s versus Mobula at 0.25 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Codex vs Mobula comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.