Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking
AggregatorsCoinGecko
Leads470
- p99
- 470
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 470
Mobula
Trails81
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 81provisional
Asset-registry chains
CoinGeckon/aMobulan/a
CoinGecko vs Mobula
CoinGecko leads on both live benchmarks. CoinGecko wins on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking (470 vs 81), Crypto price API accuracy (5.66 bps vs 9.54 bps). Data as of 2026-10-23 UTC.
CoinGecko
Crypto price and market data API built around a curated coin list, with exchange and on-chain DEX data. Keyless public tier, demo key and paid plans over REST.
Mobula
Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs. Its swap endpoint routes multi-hop across named pools, so it is typed as an aggregator on the quote benches.
Side by side measurements
Crypto price API accuracy: how far each feed sits from the exchange price
AggregatorsCoinGecko
Leads5.66 bps
- p99
- 42.6 bps
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 12,956
Mobula
Trails9.54 bps
- p99
- 90.3 bps
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 25,857
Price gap
CoinGeckon/aMobulan/a
The figure is the gap between what a price API printed and what the exchanges were quoting when the answer arrived, so it bundles two things: how the API builds its price and how old that price is. A feed refreshed every minute carries up to a minute of market drift into its gap, and that is intended, because it is what a reader of the API receives. The signed bias column separates a constant offset from noise.
Frequently asked questions
CoinGecko vs Mobula: which one is better?
CoinGecko and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. CoinGecko leads on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher asset-registry chains, CoinGecko or Mobula?
On the Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking benchmark, CoinGecko leads at 470 versus Mobula at 81 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the CoinGecko vs Mobula comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.