CoinPaprika vs Mobula

CoinPaprika leads on both live benchmarks. CoinPaprika wins on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking (312 vs 81), Crypto price API accuracy (7.48 bps vs 10.4 bps). Data as of 2026-10-20 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
CoinPaprika logo
CoinPaprika

Independent crypto market data API. Token prices, OHLCV, exchange tickers, and contract/platform lookups across 300+ supported chains. Public free tier with no auth.

Mobula logo
Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

Side by side measurements

Crypto price API accuracy: how far each feed sits from the exchange price

Aggregators

CoinPaprika

Leads

7.48 bps

p99
74.0 bps
rank
#3
samples
531

Mobula

Trails

10.4 bps

p99
124 bps
rank
#4
samples
20,958
Price gap
CoinPaprikan/aMobulan/a

The figure is the gap between what a price API printed and what the exchanges were quoting when the answer arrived, so it bundles two things: how the API builds its price and how old that price is. A feed refreshed every minute carries up to a minute of market drift into its gap, and that is intended, because it is what a reader of the API receives. The signed bias column separates a constant offset from noise.

Frequently asked questions

CoinPaprika vs Mobula: which one is better?

CoinPaprika and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. CoinPaprika leads on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher asset-registry chains, CoinPaprika or Mobula?

On the Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking benchmark, CoinPaprika leads at 312 versus Mobula at 81 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the CoinPaprika vs Mobula comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.