Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking
AggregatorsCoinPaprika
Leads312
- p99
- 312
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 312
Mobula
Trails81
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 81provisional
CoinPaprika leads on both live benchmarks. CoinPaprika wins on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking (312 vs 81), Crypto price API accuracy (7.48 bps vs 10.4 bps). Data as of 2026-10-20 UTC.
Independent crypto market data API. Token prices, OHLCV, exchange tickers, and contract/platform lookups across 300+ supported chains. Public free tier with no auth.
Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.
CoinPaprika
Leads312
Mobula
Trails81
CoinPaprika
Leads7.48 bps
Mobula
Trails10.4 bps
The figure is the gap between what a price API printed and what the exchanges were quoting when the answer arrived, so it bundles two things: how the API builds its price and how old that price is. A feed refreshed every minute carries up to a minute of market drift into its gap, and that is intended, because it is what a reader of the API receives. The signed bias column separates a constant offset from noise.
CoinPaprika and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. CoinPaprika leads on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking benchmark, CoinPaprika leads at 312 versus Mobula at 81 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.