Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking
AggregatorsCoinStats
Leads150
- p99
- 150
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 150
Mobula
Trails81
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 81provisional
Split decision: CoinStats leads on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking (150 vs 81); Mobula leads on Crypto price API accuracy (9.83 bps vs 10.9 bps). Data as of 2026-10-24 UTC.
Portfolio tracker and market data API. REST endpoints for prices, exchanges, NFTs, and wallet balances across 100+ blockchains. Consumer app + paid API tiers.
Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs. Its swap endpoint routes multi-hop across named pools, so it is typed as an aggregator on the quote benches.
CoinStats
Leads150
Mobula
Trails81
CoinStats
Trails10.9 bps
Mobula
Leads9.83 bps
The figure is the gap between what a price API printed and what the exchanges were quoting when the answer arrived, so it bundles two things: how the API builds its price and how old that price is. A feed refreshed every minute carries up to a minute of market drift into its gap, and that is intended, because it is what a reader of the API receives. The signed bias column separates a constant offset from noise.
CoinStats and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. CoinStats leads on Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking. Mobula leads on Crypto price API accuracy. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Crypto data API with most blockchains in asset registry, live coverage ranking benchmark, CoinStats leads at 150 versus Mobula at 81 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Crypto price API accuracy benchmark, Mobula leads at 9.83 bps versus CoinStats at 10.9 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.