deBridge vs LI.FI

Split decision: deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (158 ms vs 1.71 s); LI.FI leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.45% vs 1.08%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
deBridge logo
deBridge

Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.

LI.FI logo
LI.FI

Cross-chain bridge and DEX aggregator. Routes swaps across bridges and liquidity sources via a single API, with EVM and Solana support.

Side by side measurements

Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking

Bridges

deBridge

Leads

158 ms

p99
1.89 s
rank
#2
samples
287

LI.FI

Trails

1.71 s

p99
5.60 s
rank
#5
samples
286

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderEU-WestAggregate
Sol to BasedeBridge-140 ms
LI.FI-2.39 s
Base to ArbdeBridge175 ms176 ms
LI.FI1.54 s1.54 s

Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional

Bridges

deBridge

Trails

1.08 %

p99
1.15%
rank
#8
samples
25,884

LI.FI

Leads

0.45 %

p99
0.98%
rank
#7
samples
34,509

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderEU-WestUS-EastSingaporeAggregate
Sol to BasedeBridge0.88%0.88%0.89%0.88%
LI.FI0.25%0.28%0.28%0.27%
Base to ArbdeBridge1.07%1.06%1.07%1.07%
LI.FI0.57%0.59%0.60%0.59%
Arb to SoldeBridge1.28%1.28%1.28%1.28%
LI.FI0.32%0.32%0.32%0.32%

Frequently asked questions

deBridge vs LI.FI: which one is better?

deBridge and LI.FI are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. LI.FI leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, deBridge or LI.FI?

On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, deBridge leads at 158 ms versus LI.FI at 1.71 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, deBridge or LI.FI?

On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, LI.FI leads at 0.45% versus deBridge at 1.08%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the deBridge vs LI.FI comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.