Split decision: deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (319 ms vs 3.50 s); NEAR Intents leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.044% vs 1.02%).
Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.
Cross-chain intent layer from NEAR Protocol. The 1Click API runs a solver auction bus, signed quotes are settled by the winning market maker. Quote latency reflects bid arrival, not route search across LPs.
deBridge
Leads319 ms
NEAR Intents
Trails3.50 s
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 167 ms | 167 ms |
| NEAR Intents | 3.50 s | 3.51 s | |
| Base to Arb | deBridge | 94 ms | 402 ms |
| NEAR Intents | 3.50 s | 3.50 s | |
| Arb to Sol | deBridge | 76 ms | 76 ms |
| NEAR Intents | 3.50 s | 10.00 s |
deBridge
Trails1.02 %
NEAR Intents
Leads0.044 %
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 0.89% | 0.89% |
| NEAR Intents | 0.017% | 0.017% | |
| Base to Arb | deBridge | 0.94% | 0.99% |
| NEAR Intents | 0.015% | 0.015% | |
| Arb to Sol | deBridge | 1.19% | 1.27% |
| NEAR Intents | 0.019% | 0.019% |
deBridge and NEAR Intents are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. NEAR Intents leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, deBridge leads at 319 ms versus NEAR Intents at 3.50 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, NEAR Intents leads at 0.044% versus deBridge at 1.02%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.