deBridge leads on 1 of 2 shared benchmarks, NEAR Intents on 1. deBridge wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (347 ms vs 2.02 s). NEAR Intents wins on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (1.19% vs 16.5%).
Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.
Cross-chain intent layer from NEAR Protocol. The 1Click API runs a solver auction bus, signed quotes are settled by the winning market maker. Quote latency reflects bid arrival, not route search across LPs.
deBridge
Leads347 ms
NEAR Intents
Trails2.02 s
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 220 ms | 419 ms | 415 ms | 371 ms |
| NEAR Intents | 3.51 s | 3.52 s | 3.55 s | 3.53 s |
deBridge
Trails16.5 %
NEAR Intents
Leads1.19 %
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 14.4% | 14.4% | 14.4% | 14.4% |
| NEAR Intents | 0.027% | 0.027% | 0.027% | 0.027% |
deBridge and NEAR Intents are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. NEAR Intents leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, deBridge leads at 347 ms versus NEAR Intents at 2.02 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, NEAR Intents leads at 1.19% versus deBridge at 16.5%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.