deBridge vs Socket Protocol

deBridge leads on 1 of 2 shared benchmarks, Socket Protocol on 1. deBridge wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (361 ms vs 1.75 s). Socket Protocol wins on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.33% vs 16.7%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
deBridge logo
deBridge

Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.

Socket Protocol logo
Socket Protocol

Cross-chain interoperability protocol and bridge aggregator. The Socket API routes bridging and swap transactions across major EVM chains via underlying bridges including Across, Stargate, and CCTP.

Side by side measurements

Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking

Bridges

deBridge

Leads

361 ms

p99
3.03 s
rank
#2
samples
10,374

Socket Protocol

Trails

1.75 s

p99
9.51 s
rank
#6
samples
864

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderEU-WestAggregate
Base to ArbdeBridge259 ms363 ms
Socket Protocol1.76 s1.76 s

Frequently asked questions

deBridge vs Socket Protocol: which one is better?

deBridge and Socket Protocol are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. Socket Protocol leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest cross-chain bridge quote api, live ms ranking, deBridge or Socket Protocol?

On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, deBridge leads at 361 ms versus Socket Protocol at 1.75 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on cheapest cross-chain bridge for usdc at $300 notional, deBridge or Socket Protocol?

On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, Socket Protocol leads at 0.33% versus deBridge at 16.7%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the deBridge vs Socket Protocol comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.