deBridge vs Squid Router

Split decision: deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (101 ms vs 288 ms); Squid Router leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.050% vs 1.03%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
deBridge logo
deBridge

Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.

Squid Router logo
Squid Router

Cross-chain swap and liquidity routing built on Axelar. The Squid Router API sources routes across EVM chains via Axelar GMP, covering swaps and bridges in a single call.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

deBridge vs Squid Router: which one is better?

deBridge and Squid Router are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. Squid Router leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, deBridge or Squid Router?

On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, deBridge leads at 101 ms versus Squid Router at 288 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, deBridge or Squid Router?

On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, Squid Router leads at 0.050% versus deBridge at 1.03%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the deBridge vs Squid Router comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.