dYdX vs Gains

dYdX leads on 1 of 12 shared benchmarks, Gains on 11. dYdX wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.277x vs 5.54x). Gains wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.040% vs 0.081%), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($15.00M vs $10.49M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (355 vs 73), Perp DEX cost invariance (1.000x vs 1.902x). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h12 shared benchmarks
dYdX logo
dYdX

Perp DEX on the dYdX Chain, a Cosmos SDK appchain. Orderbook with off-chain matching and onchain settlement, validators propagate orders via the mempool.

Gains logo
Gains

Perp DEX on Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and Solana. Pool-based execution against the gToken vaults, oracle-priced trades with synthetic leverage.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

dYdX

$232M vs $139M

30d lead

Gains

$1.27B vs $1.91B

Days led, last 30

13 / 17

dYdX / Gains

Current streak

1 day

Gains since Oct 10, 2026

dYdXGains

UTC days, one side per trade

0125M250M375M500MJul 13Oct 10lead

dYdX volume ÷ Gains volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

166.6% · week to 10 Oct · median 78.0%

dYdX ÷ Gains, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%50%100%150%200%250%300%median 78%27 Jun11 Jul25 Jul8 Aug22 Aug5 Sep19 Sep3 Oct10 Oct

4 Oct to 10 Oct

dYdX ÷ Gains166.6%
vs median+88.6pt
= dYdX volume$232.0M
÷ Gains volume$139.2M
WindowdYdXGainsdYdX / Gains
Last closed day (Oct 10, 2026)$13.0M$15.7M83%
Last 7 days$232M$139M167%
Last 30 days$1.27B$1.91B66%

Sources: dYdX, dYdX v4 indexer 1DAY candles usdVolume summed over all perpetual markets. Gains, Dune view dune.gains.result_g_trade_stats_defi_llama (the DeFiLlama adapter's source): Arbitrum, Polygon, Base, MegaETH; ApeChain not included. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Oct 10, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX security track record: days without a recorded exploit, live

Trading

dYdX

Trails

1,107

p99
1,107
rank
#3
samples
2,880

Gains

Leads

1,776

p99
1,776
rank
#1
samples
2,880
Days since last exploit
dYdXn/aGainsn/a

This benchmark counts recorded incidents only. Absence from the registry does not prove a protocol is exploit-free: it means no incident matching the criteria (direct theft or loss of user funds via a security vulnerability) has been documented in the tracked sources as of the registry timestamp shown on each row. The registry is human-curated and updated when a new incident is confirmed. The registry date and source links are embedded in the harness.

Rolling 24h · Days since last exploitRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

dYdX

Trails

2

p99
2
rank
#15
samples
2,880

Gains

Leads

109

p99
109
rank
#5
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
dYdXn/aGainsn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

dYdX

Trails

0.673

p99
0.673
rank
#10
samples
2,880

Gains

Leads

42

p99
42
rank
#1
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
dYdXn/aGainsn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Lighter, GMX, dYdX, GNS live

Trading

dYdX

Trails

40.3x

p99
40.3x
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Gains

Leads

1.327x

p99
1.327x
rank
#1
samples
2,880
P/E ratio
dYdXn/aGainsn/a

P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesP/SFees 30dRevenue 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
dYdX35.5x40.3x35.5x$275.1K$275.1K88.3%$37.63M0.089x
Gains0.993x0.993x1.327x$774.8K$580.0K100.0%$2.72M3.47x
View
dYdXn/aGainsn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
dYdX$12.95M$1.27B0.34%
Gains$15.69M$1.91B0.52%
View
dYdXn/aGainsn/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Rolling 24h · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

dYdX

Leads

0.277x

p99
0.381x
rank
#6
samples
2,880

Gains

Trails

5.54x

p99
7.67x
rank
#20
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
dYdXn/aGainsn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

dYdX vs Gains: which one is better?

dYdX and Gains are compared on 12 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dYdX leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. Gains leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the lower volume / oi (24h), dYdX or Gains?

On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, dYdX leads at 0.277x versus Gains at 5.54x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, dYdX or Gains?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Gains leads at 0.040% versus dYdX at 0.081%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dYdX vs Gains comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.