dYdX vs Lighter RH

dYdX leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Lighter RH on 3. dYdX wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.924x vs 3.20x). Lighter RH wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.87 bps vs 3.35 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($570.96M vs $40.15M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (71 vs 57). Data as of 2026-11-07 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks, 4 measured on both sides
dYdX logo
dYdX

Perp DEX on the dYdX Chain, a Cosmos SDK appchain. Orderbook with off-chain matching and onchain settlement, validators propagate orders via the mempool.

Lighter RH logo
Lighter RH

Lighter's Robinhood deployment: the same zk order-book engine as Lighter mainnet on a separate host (api.rh.lighter.xyz) with its own books, listing US equities next to crypto perps.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

dYdX

Trails

3.35 bps

p99
5.08 bps
rank
#18
samples
2,880

Lighter RH

Leads

2.87 bps

p99
2.41 bps
rank
#9
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
dYdXn/aLighter RHn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

dYdX

No data in window

Lighter RH

Leads

46

p99
46
rank
#11
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
dYdXn/aLighter RHn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

dYdX

Leads

0.924x

p99
1.456x
rank
#8
samples
2,880

Lighter RH

Trails

3.20x

p99
3.90x
rank
#16
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
dYdXn/aLighter RHn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

dYdX vs Lighter RH: which one is better?

dYdX and Lighter RH are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dYdX leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. Lighter RH leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the lower volume / oi (24h), dYdX or Lighter RH?

On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, dYdX leads at 0.924x versus Lighter RH at 3.20x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, dYdX or Lighter RH?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Lighter RH leads at 2.87 bps versus dYdX at 3.35 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dYdX vs Lighter RH comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.