dYdX vs Vest

dYdX leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Vest on 3. dYdX wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (1.71 bps vs 3.00 bps). Vest wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($117.86M vs $68.32M), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.00000% vs 0.058%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (88 vs 57). Data as of 2026-11-07 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks, 4 measured on both sides
dYdX logo
dYdX

Perp DEX on the dYdX Chain, a Cosmos SDK appchain. Orderbook with off-chain matching and onchain settlement, validators propagate orders via the mempool.

Vest logo
Vest

Vest is a zk-settled perpetuals exchange listing crypto next to US equities, indices and FX perps under a {TICKER}-USD-PERP convention, with a public REST API (ticker, funding, order book) and no open-interest feed.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

dYdX

Leads

1.71 bps

p99
3.41 bps
rank
#4
samples
2,880

Vest

Trails

3.00 bps

p99
-3.59 bps
rank
#17
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
dYdXn/aVestn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

dYdX

Trails

0.058 %

p99
0.023%
rank
#17
samples
2,880

Vest

Leads

0.00000 %

p99
0.023%
rank
#1
samples
2,880
24h ETH funding stddev
dYdXn/aVestn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

dYdX

No data in window

Vest

Leads

75

p99
75
rank
#6
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
dYdXn/aVestn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

dYdX vs Vest: which one is better?

dYdX and Vest are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dYdX leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Vest leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, dYdX or Vest?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, dYdX leads at 1.71 bps versus Vest at 3.00 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, dYdX or Vest?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Vest leads at $117.86M versus dYdX at $68.32M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dYdX vs Vest comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.