Ethereum vs Kaia

Kaia leads on all 4 live benchmarks. Kaia wins on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live wall-clock measurement per chain (0.34 s vs 15.8 min), Highest staking yield, live net APR by proof-of-stake chain (3.92% vs 2.50%), Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains ($0.0000172 vs $0.00498), Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain ($0.000459 vs $0.1054). Data as of 2026-11-14 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Ethereum logo
Ethereum

PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.

Kaia logo
Kaia

EVM-compatible L1 formed from the merger of Klaytn and Finschia, using Istanbul BFT consensus with immediate finality and one-second blocks.

Side by side measurements

Highest staking yield, live net APR by proof-of-stake chain

Blockchains

Ethereum

Trails

2.50 %

rank
#11
samples
1provisional

Kaia

Leads

3.92 %

rank
#8
samples
9provisional
Net yield
Ethereumn/aKaian/a

Nominal yield in the staked token, not real yield: a 19% APR on a token that inflates 12% a year is worth less than it looks, and price moves dominate both. MEV is included on Solana only and excluded on Ethereum. ICP is one neuron profile (2 year dissolve delay), Algorand one opt-in solo node, Ethereum one network average. Stellar and Somnia are not ranked, see the methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Ethereum vs Kaia: which one is better?

Ethereum and Kaia are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Kaia leads on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live wall-clock measurement per chain. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Ethereum or Kaia?

On the Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live wall-clock measurement per chain benchmark, Kaia leads at 0.34 s versus Ethereum at 15.8 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ethereum vs Kaia comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.