Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesEthereum
Trails17.0 min
- p99
- 24.6 min
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 109
Osmosis
Leads45.42 s
- p99
- 2.0 min
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 284
Ethereum vs Osmosis
Osmosis leads on the only live benchmark. Osmosis wins on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (45.42 s vs 17.0 min).
Ethereum
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Ethereum vs Osmosis: which one is better?
Ethereum and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Osmosis leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Ethereum or Osmosis?
On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, Osmosis leads at 45.42 s versus Ethereum at 17.0 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Ethereum vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.