Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingExtended
Leads$694.25M
- p99
- $1.10B
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2,872
Jupiter Perps
Trails$291.06M
- p99
- $353.45M
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 2,876
24h perp volume
Extendedn/aJupiter Perpsn/a
Extended vs Jupiter Perps
Extended leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Jupiter Perps on 1. Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($694.25M vs $291.06M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 3). Jupiter Perps wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (3.21x vs 3.49x). Data as of 2026-09-24 UTC.
Extended
Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.
Jupiter Perps
Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingExtended
Leads326
- p99
- 326
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 2,872
Jupiter Perps
Trails3
- p99
- 3
- rank
- #22
- samples
- 2,876
Active markets
Extendedn/aJupiter Perpsn/a
Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live
Trading| Provider | Fees 30d | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended | $1.72M | $100.17M | 0.209x |
| Jupiter Perps | $19.33M | $43.49M | 5.41x |
View
Extendedn/aJupiter Perpsn/a
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live
TradingExtended
Trails3.49x
- p99
- 5.51x
- rank
- #19
- samples
- 2,872
Jupiter Perps
Leads3.21x
- p99
- 3.90x
- rank
- #18
- samples
- 2,876
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aJupiter Perpsn/a
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Frequently asked questions
Extended vs Jupiter Perps: which one is better?
Extended and Jupiter Perps are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Extended or Jupiter Perps?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $694.25M versus Jupiter Perps at $291.06M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which has the lower volume / oi (24h), Extended or Jupiter Perps?
On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at 3.21x versus Extended at 3.49x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Extended vs Jupiter Perps comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.