Extended vs Kalshi

Extended leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks, Kalshi on 2. Extended wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 26), Perp DEX asset breadth (131 vs 7), Perp DEX volume to open interest (1.500x vs 10.3x). Kalshi wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (0.15 bps vs 1.22 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($461.08M vs $300.61M). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks, 5 measured on both sides
Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

Kalshi logo
Kalshi

CFTC-regulated US prediction market exchange. REST trade API (trade-api/v2) with documented per-tier rate limits; the market data WebSocket requires authentication.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Extended

Trails

1.22 bps

p99
3.12 bps
rank
#14
samples
2,832

Kalshi

Leads

0.15 bps

p99
18.5 bps
rank
#9
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Extendedn/aKalshin/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Extended

Leads

131

p99
131
rank
#2
samples
2,880

Kalshi

Trails

7

p99
7
rank
#14
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Extendedn/aKalshin/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Extended

Leads

1.500x

p99
2.25x
rank
#15
samples
2,880

Kalshi

Trails

10.3x

p99
17.3x
rank
#21
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Extendedn/aKalshin/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Extended

Trails

75.7 bps

p99
58.1 bps
rank
—
samples
421

Kalshi

No data in window

Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Extendedn/aKalshin/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 24h · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Extended vs Kalshi: which one is better?

Extended and Kalshi are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Kalshi leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, Extended or Kalshi?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Extended leads at 326 versus Kalshi at 26. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Extended or Kalshi?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Kalshi leads at 0.15 bps versus Extended at 1.22 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Extended vs Kalshi comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.