Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL
Trading| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended | 0.026% | 0.030% | 0.048% |
| Lighter | 0.0023% | 0.0098% | 0.036% |
Split decision: Extended leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (286 vs 212) and Perp DEX cost invariance (1.202x vs 9.13x); Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.0023% vs 0.026%) and Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($2.48B vs $603.97M).
Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.
Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.
| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended | 0.026% | 0.030% | 0.048% |
| Lighter | 0.0023% | 0.0098% | 0.036% |
Extended
Trails$603.97M
Lighter
Leads$2.48B
Extended
Leads286
Lighter
Trails212
| Provider | Cost slope ($1M / $1k) | $1M fill rate |
|---|---|---|
| Extended | 1.202x | 100.0% |
| Lighter | 9.13x | 99.7% |
Extended and Lighter are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Extended leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues. Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues benchmark, Extended leads at 286 versus Lighter at 212. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Lighter leads at 0.0023% versus Extended at 0.026%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.