Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingGains
Trails$15.97M
- p99
- $17.79M
- rank
- #21
- samples
- 2,880
Jupiter Perps
Leads$123.90M
- p99
- $145.43M
- rank
- #15
- samples
- 2,880
Gains leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks, Jupiter Perps on 2. Gains wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (355 vs 3), Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 (1.278x vs 31.2x), Perp DEX price to fees (0.964x vs 5.28x). Jupiter Perps wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($123.90M vs $15.97M), Perp DEX volume to open interest (1.195x vs 6.13x). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
Perp DEX on Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and Solana. Pool-based execution against the gToken vaults, oracle-priced trades with synthetic leverage.
Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.
Gains
Trails$15.97M
Jupiter Perps
Leads$123.90M
Gains
Leads355
Jupiter Perps
Trails3
Gains
Leads1.278x
Jupiter Perps
Trails31.2x
P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.
| Provider | P/F ratio | FDV / fees | P/S | Fees 30d | Revenue 30d | Float | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gains | 0.964x | 0.964x | 1.278x | $841.5K | $634.7K | 100.0% | $2.45M | 4.19x |
| Jupiter Perps | 5.28x | 10.9x | 15.1x | $17.99M | $6.29M | 48.4% | $49.28M | 4.44x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Gains
Trails6.13x
Jupiter Perps
Leads1.195x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Gains and Jupiter Perps are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Gains leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Gains leads at 355 versus Jupiter Perps at 3. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at $123.90M versus Gains at $15.97M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.