gains.trade vs Lighter

gains.trade leads on 4 of 7 shared benchmarks, Lighter on 3. gains.trade wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (360 vs 212), Perp DEX cost invariance (1.000x vs 9.25x), Perp DEX security track record (1,725 vs 1,148), Perp DEX asset breadth (110 vs 40). Lighter wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.0022% vs 0.040%), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($2.52B vs $45.99M), Perp DEX mark price fidelity (0.031% vs 0.037%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h8 shared benchmarks
gains.trade logo
gains.trade

Perp DEX on Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and Solana. Pool-based execution against the gToken vaults, oracle-priced trades with synthetic leverage.

Lighter logo
Lighter

Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX security track record: days without a recorded exploit, live

Trading

gains.trade

Leads

1,725

p99
1,725
rank
#1
samples
2,880

Lighter

Trails

1,148

p99
1,148
rank
#2
samples
2,880

This benchmark counts recorded incidents only. Absence from the registry does not prove a protocol is exploit-free: it means no incident matching the criteria (direct theft or loss of user funds via a security vulnerability) has been documented in the tracked sources as of the registry timestamp shown on each row. The registry is human-curated and updated when a new incident is confirmed. The registry date and source links are embedded in the harness.

Rolling 24h · Days since last exploitRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, forex + stocks + indices + commodities

Trading

gains.trade

Leads

110

rank
#1

Lighter

Trails

40

rank
#2

Market count reflects the Mobula perp pairs catalog at query time. Only mainnet markets are counted (testnets excluded). Asset class tags (forex, stocks, indices, commodities) are assigned by Mobula's editorial taxonomy and updated when new pairs are listed. Venues not in the Mobula catalog (Hyperliquid, GMX, dYdX, Ostium, Vertex, Paradex, Aster) are monitored separately: their catalogs are crypto-only or verified crypto-only by native API.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

gains.trade vs Lighter: which one is better?

gains.trade and Lighter are compared on 8 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. gains.trade leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues. Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more active, gains.trade or Lighter?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues benchmark, gains.trade leads at 360 versus Lighter at 212. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, gains.trade or Lighter?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Lighter leads at 0.0022% versus gains.trade at 0.040%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the gains.trade vs Lighter comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.