Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL
Trading| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| gains.trade | 0.040% | 0.043% | 0.043% |
| Polymarket | 0.079% | 0.054% | 0.076% |
gains.trade leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Polymarket on 1. gains.trade wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.040% vs 0.079%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (360 vs 67). Polymarket wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($82.99M vs $43.86M).
Perp DEX on Polygon, Arbitrum, Base and Solana. Pool-based execution against the gToken vaults, oracle-priced trades with synthetic leverage.
The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.
| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| gains.trade | 0.040% | 0.043% | 0.043% |
| Polymarket | 0.079% | 0.054% | 0.076% |
gains.trade
Trails$43.86M
Polymarket
Leads$82.99M
gains.trade
Leads360
Polymarket
Trails67
gains.trade and Polymarket are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. gains.trade leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. Polymarket leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, gains.trade leads at 0.040% versus Polymarket at 0.079%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Polymarket leads at $82.99M versus gains.trade at $43.86M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.