Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL
Trading| Provider | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|
| GMX | 0.060% | 0.060% |
| Lighter | 0.011% | 0.031% |
GMX leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Lighter on 3. GMX wins on Perp DEX cost invariance: all-in bps at $1M vs $1k, live slope ranked (1.000x vs 5.91x). Lighter wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.0027% vs 0.060%), Perp DEX mark price fidelity: deviation from CEX spot reference, live (0.046% vs 0.065%), Perp DEX security track record: days without a recorded exploit, live (1,134 vs 395).
Perp DEX on Arbitrum and Avalanche. Pool-based execution against GLP and GM vaults, oracle-priced trades with no orderbook.
Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.
| Provider | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|
| GMX | 0.060% | 0.060% |
| Lighter | 0.011% | 0.031% |
| Provider | $1M fill rate |
|---|---|
| GMX | 100.0% |
| Lighter | 99.7% |
GMX
Trails0.065 %
Lighter
Leads0.046 %
Per chain
| Chain | GMX | Lighter |
|---|---|---|
| ETH | 0.058% | 0.046% |
| BTC | 0.065% | 0.046% |
| SOL | 0.062% | 0.038% |
GMX
Trails395
Lighter
Leads1,134
GMX
No data in window
Lighter
Leads40
GMX and Lighter are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GMX leads on Perp DEX cost invariance: all-in bps at $1M vs $1k, live slope ranked. Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX cost invariance: all-in bps at $1M vs $1k, live slope ranked benchmark, GMX leads at 1.000x versus Lighter at 5.91x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Lighter leads at 0.0027% versus GMX at 0.060%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.