Gram vs Somnia

Split decision: Gram leads on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain ($0.00527 vs $0.00962); Somnia leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains ($0.0000184 vs $0.00527). Data as of 2026-11-15 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Gram logo
Gram

Gram (formerly Toncoin, ticker renamed to GRAM in June 2026). BFT Proof-of-Stake L1 with a sharded masterchain and workchain architecture. Deterministic finality within a few seconds. Block time near 5 seconds.

Somnia logo
Somnia

EVM-compatible proof-of-stake L1 built for high throughput, where each validator produces its own data chain and a consensus chain orders them.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Gram vs Somnia: which one is better?

Gram and Somnia are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Gram leads on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain. Somnia leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on token deployment cost usd, Gram or Somnia?

On the Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost per L1 chain benchmark, Gram leads at $0.00527 versus Somnia at $0.00962. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on native transfer fee usd, Gram or Somnia?

On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Somnia leads at $0.0000184 versus Gram at $0.00527. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Gram vs Somnia comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.