Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingGRVT
Leads$471.02M
- p99
- $523.00M
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 2,880
Polymarket
Trails$26.87M
- p99
- $37.58M
- rank
- #19
- samples
- 2,880
GRVT leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Polymarket on 1. GRVT wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($471.02M vs $26.87M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (194 vs 88). Polymarket wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.280x vs 1.037x). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.
zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.
The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.
GRVT
Leads$471.02M
Polymarket
Trails$26.87M
GRVT
Leads194
Polymarket
Trails88
GRVT
Trails1.037x
Polymarket
Leads0.280x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
GRVT and Polymarket are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GRVT leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Polymarket leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, GRVT leads at $471.02M versus Polymarket at $26.87M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, Polymarket leads at 0.280x versus GRVT at 1.037x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.