Ink vs Sui

Sui leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Sui wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (3.05 s vs 8.75 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (15.00 s vs 54.00 s), Stablecoin flow by chain ($30.25M vs $29.74M). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Sui logo
Sui

Move-based L1 using Mysticeti BFT consensus over a DAG. Owned-object transactions bypass consensus via Fast Path. Deterministic finality under one second.

Side by side measurements

Stablecoin flow by chain: where dollars actually moved over 30 days

Blockchains
ProviderNet stablecoin flow (30d)30d changeStablecoin floatNet 7d7d change
Ink$29.74M19.3%$183.95M$12.12M7.05%
Sui$30.25M6.44%$499.96M$6.07M1.23%
View
Inkn/aSuin/a

Stablecoin float is where dollars are parked, not what they do. A chain can take in a billion that sits idle, and lose float to a single issuer redeeming. The figure is DefiLlama's chain-wide pegged-USD aggregate, every issuer combined; it does not separate a bridge inflow from a native mint, and a dollar bridged to an L2 counts on both chains, so rows are not additive. Read the net dollars with the percentage beside them: the same $400M is a rounding error on Ethereum and a doubling elsewhere.

Rolling 24h · Net stablecoin flow (30d)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Ink vs Sui: which one is better?

Ink and Sui are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Sui leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Ink or Sui?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Sui leads at 3.05 s versus Ink at 8.75 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ink vs Sui comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.