Jupiter vs KyberSwap

Jupiter leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, KyberSwap on 0. Jupiter wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (94.9% vs 61.1%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Jupiter logo
Jupiter

Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.

KyberSwap logo
KyberSwap

EVM DEX aggregator by Kyber Network. Pathfinder routes across 420+ liquidity sources on 17+ EVM chains, splitting trades atomically for best net output after gas.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Jupiter vs KyberSwap: which one is better?

Jupiter and KyberSwap are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Jupiter leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on best dex aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens, Jupiter or KyberSwap?

On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, Jupiter leads at 94.9% versus KyberSwap at 61.1%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Jupiter vs KyberSwap comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.