Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingJupiter Perps
Leads$128.10M
- p99
- $145.43M
- rank
- #15
- samples
- 2,880
ORDER
Trails$28.92M
- p99
- $45.30M
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 2,880
24h perp volume
Jupiter Perpsn/aORDERn/a
Jupiter Perps vs ORDER
Jupiter Perps leads on both live benchmarks. Jupiter Perps wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($128.10M vs $28.92M), Perp DEX price to fees (5.25x vs 8.74x). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
Jupiter Perps
Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.
ORDER
Orderly Network is a permissionless liquidity layer for on-chain perpetuals. Front-ends (including WOOFi Pro) route orders through a shared CLOB infrastructure deployed across Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base and other chains.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees
Trading| Provider | P/F ratio | FDV / fees | Fees 30d | Float | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jupiter Perps | 5.25x | 10.9x | $17.99M | 48.4% | $49.28M | 4.44x |
| ORDER | 8.74x | 21.2x | $148.2K | 41.1% | $18.87M | 0.096x |
View
Jupiter Perpsn/aORDERn/a
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Jupiter Perps vs ORDER: which one is better?
Jupiter Perps and ORDER are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Jupiter Perps or ORDER?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at $128.10M versus ORDER at $28.92M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Jupiter Perps vs ORDER comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.