Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingKalshi
Trails21
- p99
- 22
- rank
- #20
- samples
- 2,876
Ostium
Leads83
- p99
- 83
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 2,876
Ostium leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Ostium wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (83 vs 21), Perp DEX asset breadth (74 vs 4), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.365x vs 40.5x). Data as of 2026-09-24 UTC.
CFTC-regulated US prediction market exchange. REST trade API (trade-api/v2) with documented per-tier rate limits; the market data WebSocket requires authentication.
Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.
Kalshi
Trails21
Ostium
Leads83
Kalshi
Trails4
Ostium
Leads74
Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.
Kalshi
Trails40.5x
Ostium
Leads0.365x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Kalshi and Ostium are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ostium leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Ostium leads at 83 versus Kalshi at 21. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.