Kalshi vs Paradex

Kalshi leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks, Paradex on 2. Kalshi wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (1.17 bps vs 7.62 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.62B vs $20.14M), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.015% vs 0.052%). Paradex wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (63 vs 20), Perp DEX asset breadth (21 vs 2).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Kalshi logo
Kalshi

CFTC-regulated US prediction market exchange. REST trade API (trade-api/v2) with documented per-tier rate limits; the market data WebSocket requires authentication.

Paradex logo
Paradex

Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Kalshi

Leads

1.17 bps

p99
0 bps
rank
#3
samples
198

Paradex

Trails

7.62 bps

p99
2.97 bps
rank
#12
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Kalshin/aParadexn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (1h for Hyperliquid and dYdX, 4h or 8h elsewhere); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Kalshi

Leads

0.015 %

p99
0%
rank
samples
198

Paradex

Trails

0.052 %

p99
0.00049%
rank
#13
samples
2,880
24h ETH funding stddev
Kalshin/aParadexn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, forex + stocks + indices + commodities

Trading

Kalshi

Trails

2

p99
2
rank
#15
samples
198

Paradex

Leads

21

p99
21
rank
#12
samples
298
Non-crypto markets
Kalshin/aParadexn/a

Market count reflects the Mobula perp pairs catalog at query time. Only mainnet markets are counted (testnets excluded). Asset class tags (forex, stocks, indices, commodities) are assigned by Mobula's editorial taxonomy and updated when new pairs are listed. Venues not in the Mobula catalog (Hyperliquid, GMX, dYdX, Ostium, Vertex, Paradex, Aster) are monitored separately: their catalogs are crypto-only or verified crypto-only by native API.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Kalshi vs Paradex: which one is better?

Kalshi and Paradex are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Kalshi leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Paradex leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Kalshi or Paradex?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Kalshi leads at 1.17 bps versus Paradex at 7.62 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher active markets, Kalshi or Paradex?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Paradex leads at 63 versus Kalshi at 20. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Kalshi vs Paradex comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.