KyberSwap vs Mobula

KyberSwap leads on the only live benchmark. KyberSwap wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (93.2% vs 69.2%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
KyberSwap logo
KyberSwap

EVM DEX aggregator by Kyber Network. Pathfinder routes across 420+ liquidity sources on 17+ EVM chains, splitting trades atomically for best net output after gas.

Mobula logo
Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

Side by side measurements

Fastest EVM swap quote API

Aggregators

KyberSwap

No data in window

Mobula

No data in window

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderUS EastEU WestAggregate
EthereumKyberSwap422 ms414 ms398 ms
Mobula368 ms359 ms363 ms
BaseKyberSwap364 ms358 ms359 ms
Mobula355 ms353 ms354 ms

Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens

Aggregators

KyberSwap

Leads

93.2 %

p99
93.2%
rank
#2
samples
895

Mobula

Trails

69.2 %

p99
69.2%
rank
#3
samples
2,246

Per chain

ChainKyberSwapMobula
BNB79.7%100.0%
Robinhood100.0%100.0%

Coverage means the aggregator returned a non-zero output amount for the probed token. It says nothing about quote quality, price accuracy or transaction success rate. A high score means the routing engine found at least one valid path. Latency is measured separately on evm-quote-latency and solana-dex-quote-latency. The token universe rotates hourly so the score reflects live indexer freshness, not a curated whitelist.

Frequently asked questions

KyberSwap vs Mobula: which one is better?

KyberSwap and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. KyberSwap leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more reliable, KyberSwap or Mobula?

On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, KyberSwap leads at 93.2% versus Mobula at 69.2%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the KyberSwap vs Mobula comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.