Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingLighter
Leads$1.32B
- p99
- $1.62B
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 2,880
ORDER
Trails$28.72M
- p99
- $45.30M
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 2,880
Lighter leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, ORDER on 1. Lighter wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.32B vs $28.72M), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($2.06B vs $45.30M). ORDER wins on Perp DEX price to fees (8.80x vs 15.7x). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.
Orderly Network is a permissionless liquidity layer for on-chain perpetuals. Front-ends (including WOOFi Pro) route orders through a shared CLOB infrastructure deployed across Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base and other chains.
Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.
7d lead
Lighter
$12.90B vs $405M
30d lead
Lighter
$51.71B vs $1.39B
Days led, last 30
30 / 0
Lighter / ORDER
Current streak
90 days
Lighter since Jul 8, 2026
UTC days, one side per trade
Lighter volume ÷ ORDER volume, week by week
The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.
3185.8% · week to 5 Oct · median 1755.6%
Lighter ÷ ORDER, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day
29 Sep to 5 Oct
| Lighter ÷ ORDER | 3185.8% |
| vs median | +1430.2pt |
| = Lighter volume | $12.90B |
| ÷ ORDER volume | $405.0M |
| Window | Lighter | ORDER | Lighter / ORDER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last closed day (Oct 5, 2026) | $2.06B | $45.3M | 4554% |
| Last 7 days | $12.90B | $405M | 3186% |
| Last 30 days | $51.71B | $1.39B | 3709% |
Sources: Lighter, Lighter 1d candles quote volume summed over perp markets (market_id < 2048), zkLighter mainnet + Robinhood chain deployment. ORDER, Orderly Network md/volume/daily_stats, all chains. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Oct 5, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.
Lighter
Leads$1.32B
ORDER
Trails$28.72M
| Provider | P/F ratio | FDV / fees | Fees 30d | Float | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lighter | 15.7x | 62.8x | $5.23M | 25.0% | $605.28M | 0.105x |
| ORDER | 8.80x | 21.2x | $148.2K | 41.1% | $18.87M | 0.096x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
| Provider | Daily perp volume | Volume 30d | Share 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lighter | $2.06B | $51.71B | 14.1% |
| ORDER | $45.30M | $1.39B | 0.38% |
Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.
Lighter and ORDER are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Lighter leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. ORDER leads on Perp DEX price to fees. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Lighter leads at $1.32B versus ORDER at $28.72M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX price to fees benchmark, ORDER leads at 8.80x versus Lighter at 15.7x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.