Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingLighter
Leads213
- p99
- 213
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 2,880
Ostium
Trails83
- p99
- 83
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 2,880
Lighter leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Ostium on 3. Lighter wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (213 vs 83). Ostium wins on Perp DEX asset breadth (74 vs 38), Perp DEX capital efficiency (19 vs 0.284), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.099x vs 2.09x). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.
Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.
Arbitrum-based perp DEX specialized in RWA exposure including FX, commodities and indices.
Lighter
Leads213
Ostium
Trails83
Lighter
Trails38
Ostium
Leads74
Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.
Lighter
Trails0.284
Ostium
Leads19
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
| Provider | Fees 30d | Revenue 30d | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lighter | $5.75M | $4.73M | $567.84M | 0.123x |
| Ostium | $147.5K | $28.3K | $8.59M | 0.209x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Lighter
Trails2.09x
Ostium
Leads0.099x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Lighter and Ostium are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Lighter leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ostium leads on Perp DEX asset breadth. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Lighter leads at 213 versus Ostium at 83. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX asset breadth benchmark, Ostium leads at 74 versus Lighter at 38. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.