Lighter vs Paradex

Lighter leads on 5 of 6 shared benchmarks, Paradex on 1. Lighter wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.0027% vs 0.037%), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($977.61M vs $6.72M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (205 vs 62), Perp DEX mark price fidelity: deviation from CEX spot reference, live (0.046% vs 0.068%). Paradex wins on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0054% vs 0.011%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Lighter logo
Lighter

Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.

Paradex logo
Paradex

Paradex is a perps-focused L2 exchange built on Starknet tech, with USD-settled perpetuals and funding accrued continuously over an 8 hour period.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Lighter vs Paradex: which one is better?

Lighter and Paradex are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. Paradex leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on cheapest perp dex, live all-in cost from $1k to $1m on eth, btc and sol, Lighter or Paradex?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Lighter leads at 0.0027% versus Paradex at 0.037%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on perp dex funding stability, 24h stddev of eth funding ranked, Lighter or Paradex?

On the Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked benchmark, Paradex leads at 0.0054% versus Lighter at 0.011%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Lighter vs Paradex comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.