Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingLighter
Leads$1.83B
- p99
- $2.15B
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,879
StandX
Trails$375.42M
- p99
- $390.70M
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 630
24h perp volume
Lightern/aStandXn/a
Lighter vs StandX
Lighter leads on both live benchmarks. Lighter wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.83B vs $375.42M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (213 vs 13).
Lighter
Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.
ST
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked
TradingLighter
No data in window
StandX
No data in window
24h ETH funding stddev
Lightern/aStandXn/a
Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingLighter
Leads213
- p99
- 214
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 2,879
StandX
Trails13
- p99
- 13
- rank
- #21
- samples
- 630
Active markets
Lightern/aStandXn/a
Frequently asked questions
Lighter vs StandX: which one is better?
Lighter and StandX are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Lighter leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Lighter or StandX?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Lighter leads at $1.83B versus StandX at $375.42M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Lighter vs StandX comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.