Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingLighter
Leads$1.93B
- p99
- $2.22B
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,880
Vest
Trails$235.99M
- p99
- $255.33M
- rank
- #15
- samples
- 198
Lighter leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Vest on 1. Lighter wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.93B vs $235.99M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (213 vs 88). Vest wins on Perp DEX asset breadth (75 vs 38).
Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.
Lighter
Leads$1.93B
Vest
Trails$235.99M
Lighter
No data in window
Vest
Trails0.0047 %
Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.
Lighter
Leads213
Vest
Trails88
Lighter
Trails38
Vest
Leads75
Market count reflects the Mobula perp pairs catalog at query time. Only mainnet markets are counted (testnets excluded). Asset class tags (forex, stocks, indices, commodities) are assigned by Mobula's editorial taxonomy and updated when new pairs are listed. Venues not in the Mobula catalog (Hyperliquid, GMX, dYdX, Ostium, Vertex, Paradex, Aster) are monitored separately: their catalogs are crypto-only or verified crypto-only by native API.
Lighter and Vest are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Lighter leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Vest leads on Perp DEX asset breadth. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Lighter leads at $1.93B versus Vest at $235.99M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX asset breadth benchmark, Vest leads at 75 versus Lighter at 38. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.