Maestro vs Trojan

Trojan leads on all 4 live benchmarks. Trojan wins on Solana trading platform leaderboard ($32.39M vs $1.49M), Memecoin trading fees (0.17% vs 0.96%), Average swap size on Solana ($110.8 vs $103.87), Unique daily swap transactions on Solana (80.1K vs 12.7K).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Maestro logo
Maestro

Maestro is a suite of Telegram trading bots for DeFi — Sniper, Wallet, Whale and Buy — trusted by traders on Solana, Ethereum, BNB Chain and Base. It charges a 1% fee on each sniped buy.

Trojan logo
Trojan

Trojan is a Telegram trading bot for Solana memecoins. It provides fast sniping, copy trading, limit orders and MEV protection, charging a 0.9% fee per trade routed through pump.fun and Raydium pools.

Side by side measurements

Solana trading platform leaderboard: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Axiom vs Fomo, live 24h volume

Trading

Maestro

Trails

$1.49M

p99
$1.49M
rank
#8
samples
21,669

Trojan

Leads

$32.39M

p99
$32.39M
rank
#5
samples
48,856

Volume figures are sourced from Mobula's lighthouse aggregator, which indexes on-chain swap events attributed to each trading platform or Telegram bot. Data is refreshed every 15 minutes. Platforms with zero volume may indicate no attributable on-chain activity in the last 24 hours or a temporary attribution gap in Mobula's indexing.

Explicit platform fees for trading memecoins (pump.fun vs Fomo vs Photon vs bots)

Trading
ProviderMedian feeTrade count (24h)
Maestroprovisional0.96%1
Trojan0.17%2

Take rate = fees / volume * 100. Fees are on-chain inflows to known fee wallets (Dune query 8316589, refreshed every 6h). Fomo fees come from DeFiLlama (on-chain USDC + off-chain relay). Volume is total Mobula-attributed volume; the take rate is a lower bound since platforms with variable or waivable fees will show lower observed rates.

Average swap size on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom, live

Trading

Maestro

Trails

$103.87

p99
$103.87
rank
#2
samples
14,313

Trojan

Leads

$110.8

p99
$110.8
rank
#1
samples
292,346

Average swap size is computed as 24h attributed volume divided by 24h attributed trade count from Mobula lighthouse. Both numerator and denominator include bot and MEV activity; the metric reflects all on-chain swaps attributed to each platform, not human-only trades. pump.fun volume comes from the byLaunchpad bucket (bonding-curve swaps via pump.fun's own frontend); all other platforms come from byPlatform. Attribution is mutually exclusive per Mobula's referral-tag methodology.

Unique daily swap transactions on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom vs Trojan, live

Trading

Maestro

Trails

12.7K

p99
12.7K
rank
#7
samples
12,726

Trojan

Leads

80.1K

p99
80.1K
rank
#5
samples
80,131

Counts unique tx_ids per platform, not unique wallets. Actual unique-wallet count is 3-10x lower since active traders execute multiple transactions per day. Includes bots, MEV searchers, and multi-wallet traders. Terminals (GMGN, Axiom, Fomo, Trojan, Photon, Maestro) use fee wallet inflow detection; pump.fun uses Dune Spellbook (dex_solana.trades, project IN pumpdotfun/pumpswap) to avoid noise from fee-wallet micro-inflows at 0% fee.

Rolling 24h · Unique swap tx 24hRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Maestro vs Trojan: which one is better?

Maestro and Trojan are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Trojan leads on Solana trading platform leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Maestro or Trojan?

On the Solana trading platform leaderboard benchmark, Trojan leads at $32.39M versus Maestro at $1.49M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Maestro vs Trojan comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.