Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens
AggregatorsMobula
No data in window
ParaSwap
No data in window
Per chain
| Chain | Mobula | ParaSwap |
|---|---|---|
| Base | 2.03% | 2.03% |
| BNB | 100.0% | 23.1% |
Mobula vs ParaSwap
Mobula leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, ParaSwap on 0. Mobula wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (85.1% vs 13.2%).
Mobula
Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.
ParaSwap
DEX aggregator and DeFi middleware layer. The Augustus Router splits orders across AMMs, PMMs, and direct pools on 10+ EVM chains to minimize price impact and gas costs. Also offers a developer SDK for integrating best-execution routing into dApps and wallets.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Mobula vs ParaSwap: which one is better?
Mobula and ParaSwap are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Mobula leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on best dex aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens, Mobula or ParaSwap?
On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, Mobula leads at 85.1% versus ParaSwap at 13.2%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Mobula vs ParaSwap comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.