Fastest EVM swap quote API
AggregatorsMobula
Trails475 ms
- p99
- 1.22 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 4,229
Route
Leads401 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 87provisional
Quote latency
Mobulan/aRouten/a
Mobula vs Route
Route leads on both live benchmarks. Route wins on Fastest EVM swap quote API (401 ms vs 475 ms), Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (100.0% vs 33.3%). Data as of 2026-10-18 UTC.
Mobula
Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.
RO
Side by side measurements
Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens
AggregatorsMobula
Trails33.3 %
- p99
- 33.3%
- rank
- —
- samples
- 2,403
Route
Leads100.0 %
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 52provisional
Per chain
| Chain | Mobula | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Robinhood | 99.0% | 100.0% |
Quote coverage
Mobulan/aRouten/a
Coverage means the aggregator returned a non-zero output amount for the probed token. It says nothing about quote quality, price accuracy or transaction success rate. A high score means the routing engine found at least one valid path. Latency is measured separately on evm-quote-latency and solana-dex-quote-latency. The token universe rotates hourly so the score reflects live indexer freshness, not a curated whitelist.
Frequently asked questions
Mobula vs Route: which one is better?
Mobula and Route are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Route leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Mobula or Route?
On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, Route leads at 401 ms (provisional) versus Mobula at 475 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Mobula vs Route comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.