Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesMonad
Trails4.17 s
- p99
- 9.84 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 26
Sui
Leads3.69 s
- p99
- 9.56 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 193
Monad vs Sui
Monad leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Sui on 1. Sui wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (3.69 s vs 4.17 s).
Sui
Move-based L1 using Mysticeti BFT consensus over a DAG. Owned-object transactions bypass consensus via Fast Path. Deterministic finality under one second.
Side by side measurements
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesMonad
Trails23.08 s
- p99
- 1062.02 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 46
Sui
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Monad vs Sui: which one is better?
Monad and Sui are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Sui leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Monad or Sui?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Sui leads at 3.69 s versus Monad at 4.17 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Monad vs Sui comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.