Osmosis vs Polygon

Polygon leads on the only live benchmark. Polygon wins on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (45.00 s vs 45.69 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Osmosis logo
Osmosis

Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Osmosis vs Polygon: which one is better?

Osmosis and Polygon are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polygon leads on Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Osmosis or Polygon?

On the Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery benchmark, Polygon leads at 45.00 s (provisional) versus Osmosis at 45.69 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Osmosis vs Polygon comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.