Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingPacifica
Leads$962.89M
- p99
- $1.03B
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 2,878
Polymarket
Trails$102.35M
- p99
- $107.31M
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 2,878
24h perp volume
Pacifican/aPolymarketn/a
Pacifica vs Polymarket
Split decision: Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($962.89M vs $102.35M); Polymarket leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (89 vs 78).
Pacifica
Solana perp DEX optimized for high-frequency trading, oracle-anchored funding.
Polymarket
The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingPacifica
Trails78
- p99
- 78
- rank
- #15
- samples
- 2,878
Polymarket
Leads89
- p99
- 89
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 2,878
Active markets
Pacifican/aPolymarketn/a
Frequently asked questions
Pacifica vs Polymarket: which one is better?
Pacifica and Polymarket are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Pacifica leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Polymarket leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Pacifica or Polymarket?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Pacifica leads at $962.89M versus Polymarket at $102.35M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which has the higher active markets, Pacifica or Polymarket?
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Polymarket leads at 89 versus Pacifica at 78. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Pacifica vs Polymarket comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.