Relay vs Socket Protocol

Relay leads on 1 of 2 shared benchmarks, Socket Protocol on 1. Relay wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (953 ms vs 1.76 s). Socket Protocol wins on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.33% vs 2.61%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Relay logo
Relay

Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.

Socket Protocol logo
Socket Protocol

Cross-chain interoperability protocol and bridge aggregator. The Socket API routes bridging and swap transactions across major EVM chains via underlying bridges including Across, Stargate, and CCTP.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Relay vs Socket Protocol: which one is better?

Relay and Socket Protocol are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Relay leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. Socket Protocol leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest cross-chain bridge quote api, live ms ranking, Relay or Socket Protocol?

On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, Relay leads at 953 ms versus Socket Protocol at 1.76 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on cheapest cross-chain bridge for usdc at $300 notional, Relay or Socket Protocol?

On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, Socket Protocol leads at 0.33% versus Relay at 2.61%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Relay vs Socket Protocol comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.