Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAster
Leads$2.37B
- p99
- $2.85B
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 2,880
Jupiter Perps
Trails$295.55M
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 97provisional
Aster leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks, Jupiter Perps on 1. Aster wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($2.37B vs $295.55M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (586 vs 3). Jupiter Perps wins on Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026 (4.12x vs 25.1x).
Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.
Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.
Aster
Leads$2.37B
Jupiter Perps
Trails$295.55M
Aster
Leads586
Jupiter Perps
Trails3
| Provider | P/F ratio | FDV / fees | Fees 30d | Float | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aster | 25.1x | 72.2x | $6.45M | 34.8% | $1.44B | 0.054x |
| Jupiter Perps | 4.12x | 8.51x | $19.65M | 48.4% | $37.51M | 6.37x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
Aster and Jupiter Perps are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Aster leads at $2.37B versus Jupiter Perps at $295.55M (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026 benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at 4.12x versus Aster at 25.1x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.