Aster vs Jupiter Perps

Aster leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks, Jupiter Perps on 2. Aster wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.15B vs $123.90M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (594 vs 3), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.961x vs 1.195x). Jupiter Perps wins on Perp DEX price to fees (5.28x vs 30.5x), Price to fees across DeFi (5.31x vs 30.5x). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Jupiter Perps logo
Jupiter Perps

Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesFees 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
Aster30.5x87.6x$5.35M34.8%$1.44B0.045x
Jupiter Perps5.28x10.9x$17.99M48.4%$49.28M4.44x
View
Astern/aJupiter Perpsn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Aster

Leads

0.961x

p99
1.139x
rank
#10
samples
2,880

Jupiter Perps

Trails

1.195x

p99
1.403x
rank
#11
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Astern/aJupiter Perpsn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Price to fees across DeFi: what the market pays per dollar of protocol fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratiovs categoryFees MoMToken 30dFloatFDV / feesMarket capFees 30dTVLSupply 30dSupply 90d
Aster30.5x3.43x--34.8%87.6x$1.99B$5.36M$793.10M0.54%1.28%
Jupiter Perps5.31x0.593x-38.3%48.4%10.9x$1.16B$17.99M$2.92B0.047%0.047%
View
Astern/aJupiter Perpsn/a

A screen, not a verdict, and not advice. P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama, trailing 30d x 365/30) summed across every fee adapter that accrues to the token. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers. A low multiple can mean the market expects fees to fall, that the fees were incentivised, or that the token has no claim on them. Read it with the float, the category median and the monthly fee trend, then do your own work.

Frequently asked questions

Aster vs Jupiter Perps: which one is better?

Aster and Jupiter Perps are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX price to fees. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aster or Jupiter Perps?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Aster leads at $1.15B versus Jupiter Perps at $123.90M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the lower p/f ratio, Aster or Jupiter Perps?

On the Perp DEX price to fees benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at 5.28x versus Aster at 30.5x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aster vs Jupiter Perps comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.