Split decision: deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (171 ms vs 631 ms); Mobula leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.22% vs 1.08%).
Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.
Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.
deBridge
Leads171 ms
Mobula
Trails631 ms
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 140 ms | 412 ms | 379 ms | 376 ms |
| Mobula | 176 ms | 623 ms | 634 ms | 623 ms | |
| Base to Arb | deBridge | 176 ms | 384 ms | 376 ms | 384 ms |
| Mobula | 74 ms | 473 ms | 469 ms | 473 ms | |
| Arb to Sol | deBridge | 169 ms | 370 ms | 375 ms | 375 ms |
| Mobula | 194 ms | 517 ms | 542 ms | 542 ms |
deBridge
Trails1.08 %
Mobula
Leads0.22 %
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 0.88% | 0.88% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
| Mobula | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
| Base to Arb | deBridge | 1.06% | 1.06% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| Mobula | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
| Arb to Sol | deBridge | 1.28% | 1.28% | 1.28% | 1.28% |
| Mobula | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
deBridge and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. Mobula leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, deBridge leads at 171 ms versus Mobula at 631 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, Mobula leads at 0.22% versus deBridge at 1.08%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.