Jupiter Perps vs Lighter

Jupiter Perps leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks, Lighter on 2. Jupiter Perps wins on Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 (34.9x vs 64.7x), Perp DEX price to fees (5.50x vs 13.3x), Perp DEX volume to open interest (1.557x vs 2.61x), Price to fees across DeFi (5.50x vs 13.3x). Lighter wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.52B vs $145.79M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (213 vs 3). Data as of 2026-10-10 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Jupiter Perps logo
Jupiter Perps

Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.

Lighter logo
Lighter

Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Lighter, GMX, dYdX, GNS live

Trading

Jupiter Perps

Leads

34.9x

p99
34.9x
rank
#4
samples
2,880

Lighter

Trails

64.7x

p99
64.7x
rank
#7
samples
2,880
P/E ratio
Jupiter Perpsn/aLightern/a

P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesP/SFees 30dRevenue 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
Jupiter Perps5.50x11.4x16.9x$18.44M$6.01M48.4%$44.22M5.07x
Lighter13.3x53.2x16.2x$5.75M$4.73M25.0%$587.57M0.119x
View
Jupiter Perpsn/aLightern/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Jupiter Perps

Leads

1.557x

p99
3.39x
rank
#13
samples
2,880

Lighter

Trails

2.61x

p99
3.76x
rank
#17
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Jupiter Perpsn/aLightern/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Price to fees across DeFi: what the market pays per dollar of protocol fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratiovs categoryFees MoMToken 30dFloatFDV / feesMarket capFees 30dRevenue 30dP/STVLSupply 30dSupply 90d
Jupiter Perps5.50x0.698x-63.0%48.4%11.4x$1.23B$18.44M$6.01M16.9x$2.56B0.054%0.054%
Lighter13.3x1.689x12.2%-25.0%53.3x$931.99M$5.75M$4.73M16.2x$749.03M--
View
Jupiter Perpsn/aLightern/a

A screen, not a verdict, and not advice. P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama, trailing 30d x 365/30) summed across every fee adapter that accrues to the token. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers. A low multiple can mean the market expects fees to fall, that the fees were incentivised, or that the token has no claim on them. Read it with the float, the category median and the monthly fee trend, then do your own work.

Frequently asked questions

Jupiter Perps vs Lighter: which one is better?

Jupiter Perps and Lighter are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026. Lighter leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the lower p/e ratio, Jupiter Perps or Lighter?

On the Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at 34.9x versus Lighter at 64.7x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Jupiter Perps or Lighter?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Lighter leads at $1.52B versus Jupiter Perps at $145.79M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Jupiter Perps vs Lighter comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.