Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingJupiter Perps
Leads$290.18M
- p99
- $353.45M
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 2,876
Polymarket
Trails$107.57M
- p99
- $119.82M
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 2,876
Jupiter Perps leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, Polymarket on 2. Jupiter Perps wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($290.18M vs $107.57M). Polymarket wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (89 vs 3), Perp DEX volume to open interest (1.719x vs 3.21x). Data as of 2026-09-23 UTC.
Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.
The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.
Jupiter Perps
Leads$290.18M
Polymarket
Trails$107.57M
Jupiter Perps
Trails3
Polymarket
Leads89
Jupiter Perps
Trails3.21x
Polymarket
Leads1.719x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Jupiter Perps and Polymarket are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Jupiter Perps leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Polymarket leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Jupiter Perps leads at $290.18M versus Polymarket at $107.57M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Polymarket leads at 89 versus Jupiter Perps at 3. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.