LI.FI vs Relay

Relay leads on all 4 live benchmarks. Relay wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (263 ms vs 762 ms), Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.092% vs 0.37%), Fastest on-chain bridge execution (1.90 s vs 3.64 s), Fastest Solana cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (249 ms vs 739 ms). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks, 4 measured on both sides
LI.FI logo
LI.FI

Cross-chain bridge and DEX aggregator. Routes swaps across bridges and liquidity sources via a single API, with EVM and Solana support.

Relay logo
Relay

Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.

Side by side measurements

Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking

Bridges

LI.FI

Trails

762 ms

p99
2.56 s
rank
#6
samples
3,186

Relay

Leads

263 ms

p99
500 ms
rank
#3
samples
4,581

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderEU-WestAggregate
Sol to BaseLI.FI769 ms769 ms
Relay278 ms278 ms
Base to ArbLI.FI768 ms768 ms
Relay197 ms197 ms
Arb to SolLI.FI906 ms906 ms
Relay350 ms350 ms
Arb to HyperCoreLI.FI762 ms762 ms
Relay272 ms272 ms
Quote latency
LI.FIn/aRelayn/a

Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional

Bridges

LI.FI

Trails

0.37 %

p99
0.95%
rank
#7
samples
34,548

Relay

Leads

0.092 %

p99
0.13%
rank
#5
samples
34,548

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderEU-WestAggregate
Sol to BaseLI.FI0.28%0.28%
Relay0.030%0.030%
Base to ArbLI.FI0.31%0.35%
Relay0.024%0.040%
Arb to SolLI.FI0.23%0.27%
Relay0.037%0.047%
Arb to HyperCoreLI.FI-0.45%
Relay-0.20%
Effective fee
LI.FIn/aRelayn/a

Fastest Solana cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking

Bridges

LI.FI

Trails

739 ms

p99
3.16 s
rank
#5
samples
1,964

Relay

Leads

249 ms

p99
496 ms
rank
#3
samples
2,850

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderEU-WestAggregate
SOL to BaseLI.FI769 ms769 ms
Relay279 ms279 ms
SOL to ArbitrumLI.FI775 ms775 ms
Relay228 ms228 ms
SOL to BNBLI.FI736 ms736 ms
Relay200 ms200 ms
SOL to EthereumLI.FI616 ms616 ms
Relay207 ms207 ms
SOL to RobinhoodLI.FI749 ms749 ms
Relay303 ms303 ms
Quote latency
LI.FIn/aRelayn/a

Frequently asked questions

LI.FI vs Relay: which one is better?

LI.FI and Relay are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. LI.FI leads on Bridge slippage vs quote. Relay leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, LI.FI or Relay?

On the Bridge slippage vs quote benchmark, LI.FI leads at -$0.00566 (provisional) versus Relay at $0.0000023 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, LI.FI or Relay?

On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, Relay leads at 263 ms versus LI.FI at 762 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the LI.FI vs Relay comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.