Lighter vs Polymarket

Lighter leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Lighter wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.0014% vs 0.042%), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($2.81B vs $237.05M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (212 vs 52).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Lighter logo
Lighter

Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.

Polymarket logo
Polymarket

The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Lighter

No data in window

Polymarket

Trails

0.00034 %

p99
0.0062%
rank
#1
samples
2,880

Stability is not directionality. A venue with persistently positive but tight-banded funding ranks better here than one that flips between positive and negative every settlement, even if the second venue offers better average carry. Read alongside perp-funding for direction and average level.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Lighter vs Polymarket: which one is better?

Lighter and Polymarket are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Lighter or Polymarket?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Lighter leads at 0.0014% versus Polymarket at 0.042%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Lighter vs Polymarket comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.