NEAR Intents leads on 1 of 2 shared benchmarks, Relay on 1. NEAR Intents wins on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (1.19% vs 2.60%). Relay wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (905 ms vs 2.02 s).
Cross-chain intent layer from NEAR Protocol. The 1Click API runs a solver auction bus, signed quotes are settled by the winning market maker. Quote latency reflects bid arrival, not route search across LPs.
Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.
NEAR Intents
Trails2.02 s
Relay
Leads905 ms
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | NEAR Intents | 3.51 s | 3.52 s | 3.55 s | 3.53 s |
| Relay | 1.05 s | 1.04 s | 1.04 s | 1.05 s | |
| Arb to HyperCore | NEAR Intents | 42 ms | 360 ms | 367 ms | 285 ms |
| Relay | 779 ms | 813 ms | 821 ms | 803 ms |
NEAR Intents
Leads1.19 %
Relay
Trails2.60 %
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | NEAR Intents | 0.027% | 0.027% | 0.027% | 0.027% |
| Relay | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
| Arb to HyperCore | NEAR Intents | 2.35% | 2.35% | 2.35% | 2.35% |
| Relay | 8.93% | 8.93% | 8.93% | 8.93% |
NEAR Intents and Relay are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. NEAR Intents leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. Relay leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, NEAR Intents leads at 1.19% versus Relay at 2.60%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, Relay leads at 905 ms versus NEAR Intents at 2.02 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.