Polygon vs Solana

Polygon leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks, Solana on 2. Polygon wins on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation (0.10% vs 0.11%), Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (4.34 s vs 17.56 s), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (10.37 s vs 39.94 s). Solana wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.3 min vs 12.9 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (49.62 s vs 1.8 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Solana logo
Solana

Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Polygon vs Solana: which one is better?

Polygon and Solana are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polygon leads on Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation. Solana leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on chainlink vs pyth vs binance vs coinbase, live oracle deviation, Polygon or Solana?

On the Chainlink vs Pyth vs Binance vs Coinbase, live oracle deviation benchmark, Polygon leads at 0.10% versus Solana at 0.11%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on fastest chainlink ccip source chain by end-to-end delivery latency, Polygon or Solana?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Solana leads at 1.3 min versus Polygon at 12.9 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Polygon vs Solana comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.